|
|
Arkansas Latest Attack Against Women
|
Yesterday, the Arkansas state senate passed a bill that defunds Planned Parenthood. If you think this is just about abortion, you should think again.
Planned Parenthood offers essential services to the women of Arkansas. Already, only 40% of all the counties in the state even have an OB/GYN, the closing of Planned Parenthood would diminish that even further. Consider- to actually see a doctor who specializes in women’s medicine, patients in Arkansas may have no alternative but to leave the state.
Furthermore, Planned Parenthood is the only organization that provides comprehensive sex education in Arkansas high schools. The curriculum focuses on abstinence, but also provides information about pregnancy, HIV, and other STIs. Without Planned Parenthood providing the curriculum and the tools, most high schools will simply stop teaching the subject.
In defunding Planned Parenthood, Arkansas adds more insult to injury to women who would choose to end a pregnancy. After their recent anti-abortion bill, which bans abortions starting at 12 weeks, the closure of Planned Parenthood may effectively end access to care within the incredibly short timeline left to those women. It is a clear violation of their constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.
Write to the state representatives in Arkansas. Write to the governor. Do not let this stand.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- The War on Women- Arizona Front
- Good News out of Arkansas, But It’s Not Over Yet
- Planned Parenthood and Adoption Services
- Mississippi and Louisiana’s Teen Pregnancy Problem
- Arkansas: the Most anti-Woman State in the Country
April 9, 2013
|
|
Equal Pay Day
|
Today is Equal Pay Day, when the average American woman’s earnings catch up with the average American man’s for the last year.
It took from January 1, 2012 until today- April 9, 2013- for women to earn the same amount that men earned in 2012 alone. That’s more than a full three months of pay that women are being denied annually, simply because of their gender.
There are so many laws and corporate rules and social taboos that continue this problem. It’s against many company’s policies to discuss your salary with your coworkers and it’s considered rude to ask friends about their financial situations, so how can a woman learn what she SHOULD be earning, opposed to what she takes home?
We need real equal pay laws. Laws with teeth, with criminal penalties for companies that discriminate against women. We need to treat women with dignity and respect, not because any other person is in charge of caring for them, but because we are human beings.
Women, imagine that right now, every cent you’d earned in 2013 had been given to you when you earned it, last year. A full quarter of your income, denied to you. This is what is happening.
Write to the president. To your congressmen. Get angry. It’s Equal Pay Day, and it’s time somebody paid.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Equal Rights? Too Inconvenient for American Businesses
- Personhood Defeated!
- Equal Pay for Equal Work
- Governor Scott Walker Repeals Equal Pay Law
- The GOP Puts Their Money Where Their Mouth Is
April 8, 2013
|
|
Compulsory Gun Ownership
|
Republicans like to rail against big government. They’ll tell you that regulations are bad, because they don’t need anyone telling them their food is safe. They’ll tell you Obamacare is bad, because it dictates that people must buy health insurance. And then they’ll turn around, and force you to go out and buy a gun.
That’s right, in the Atlantan suburb of Nelson, Georgia, gun ownership is now compulsory.
The “Family Protection Ordinance” passed last week, and requires every head of household to purchase a gun and ammunition.
The fact that ammunition is also compulsory should show you that they expected all manner of peaceful protest to this kind of law.
What is most striking is the loopholes written into the bill to get you out of your compulsory gun ownership. If you’re a convicted felon, or have a history of mental illness.
That should sound familiar. Those same people who aren’t forced to buy guns are the same people that the majority of the public would prefer didn’t have access to guns in the first place. The same people who’s ability to purchase guns ought to be regulated.
So, gun control is bad, but forcing people (except the people who gun control is aimed at) to buy guns is good.
Glad we’ve got that cleared up.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Mass Killing at Sandy Hook Elementary School
- Sexism Week, Day Two: The NRA
- Personhood in Virginia
- Texas “Education”
- Putting Armed Child Sex Criminals in Our Schools
April 5, 2013
|
|
In Georgia High School, Prom is Still “Whites Only”
|
In Wilcox Country High School, racial integration isn’t exactly new. But one thing is- a mixed race Prom. The school always hosts two Proms and two Homecoming dances- one for whites, and one for “integrated” students. How “whites only” is it? Last year, a mixed race student was actually ejected from the dance- for not being white.
For the first time, this year the students elected only one Prom king and queen, versus the “white” and “integrated” king and queen of years past. The king is white, and the queen is black. Yet, she is still banned from the “whites only” Prom.
Many of the students have worked to end this segregation, but the school is utterly uncooperative. That’s because the Proms are not sponsored by the school- they are entirely paid for by donations from parents and students. Therefore, the students who wish to end this so-called tradition have taken matters into their own hands. They picked a day, and began raising money to put on their own Prom for everybody themselves.
Still, students in the school tear down their fundraising posters, and many of the parents are vehemently resistant.
Next time somebody tells you that racism is dead, tell them this story.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Why the GOP Doesn’t Want You to Vote
- Be the Change Friday: End of Year Giving
- Sexual Assault and the Mentally Disabled
- A Victory for GLBT Students in Minnesota
- Putting Armed Child Sex Criminals in Our Schools
April 4, 2013
|
|
This is What the End of the United States Looks Like
|
Two hundred thirty two years ago, the United States fought a war for independence. Thousands of lives were lost, but our freedom was won. During this time, the founding fathers drafted our Constitution, and immediately began amending it to ensure that the freedoms for which Americans had fought and died would be protected. The very first amendment to the United States Constitution begins, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” That’s the very first clause of the very fist amendment. It is essential to the protection of civil liberties, and has been for over two hundred years.
North Carolina is ready to abandon this document. Two GOP lawmakers have brought forward a bill that allows the state to establish a state religion (presumably, their brand of Christianity). This bill is already backed by nine other Republicans, including the State House majority leader.
This is anathema to the American way of life, to every freedom that the United States has stood for since the Revolutionary War began.
North Carolina isn’t alone. Mississippi is trying to pass a law to allow them to nullify federal laws- presumably to the same effect. In order to enact their own theocratic ideals, rather than democratic ones.
Democracy means living in peace with people who might not agree with you. Not making their differing beliefs illegal, or legally inferior.
It this law passes, we may look back at it as the day America’s decline to dust began.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- The Speed of Intolerance
- Slavery: Finally in the Past?
- Women of the 113th Congress: Tulsi Gabbard
- 2011 and the War on Women- Part Two
- The Constitution- It Means Whatever You Want It To Mean
April 3, 2013
|
|
Discriminating Against the HIV+ in Kansas
|
Kansas lawmakers look likely to pass a new bill regarding the treatment of patients with HIV. I don’t mean their medical treatment- I mean their human rights. This bill would allow for their indefinite “quarantine.”
Originally, the bill was intended to protect first responders who might be exposed to HIV. Now, that’s all well and good, but in committee, the bill was modified. Now it can be interpreted to mean that any person with HIV or AIDS could be removed from the public.
This is a severe infraction of the civil rights of any person. Most likely, these Kansas lawmakers don’t understand how HIV is spread. They seem frightened that proximity to HIV positive people is enough to spread the infection.
Our lawmakers need to be educated about issues before they begin writing laws about them. But regardless of the correctness of the science involved, writing laws that strip American citizens of their rights and liberties is always unacceptable. There is never a time when it is okay.
People of Kansas, write to your legislators. Don’t let them do this.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- In Kansas, Your Fetus Gets Better Healthcare than You
- Kansas- The New Personhood Battleground
- Sexism- Alive and Well
- Texas “Education”
- Santorum’s Moment of Honesty
April 2, 2013
|
|
Oil Spill in Arkansas
|
There has been a rupture in the Tar Sands pipeline.
Thousands of barrels of crude oil has forced people from their homes surrounding Little Rock, Arkansas.
This is why there has been so much concern over the Keystone XL pipeline. This is the hazard of of pumping crude oil underground over hundreds and thousands of miles. These are real concerns.
Is it worth it to continue using a resource that we know is limited, that we know is hazardous to our environment, that we know is bad for life- both human and animal?
The conservatives in favor of these pipelines claim they’ll create jobs. But those jobs involve cleaning the wasted oil out of the back yards of unsuspecting Americans, are those jobs we really want to have?
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Be The Change Friday: Spring Cleaning
- GOP: Dog Should Have the Right to Fight
- Be The Change Friday- Your Local Farmers Market
- Michele Bachmann’s Family Values- Gay Teens and Suicide
- Rep. Sally Kern- The GOP’s Latest Disaster Area
April 1, 2013
|
|
Why the Indian Novartis Case Matters
|
The Indian courts have ruled against an international pharmaceutical company, Novartis, allowing local companies to produce its anti-cancer drug without paying liabilities. So why does this matter here, in the United States?
There have long been debates about whether or not medicine should be a for-profit institution. If the purpose of medicine is to help people, how is it beneficial to force sick people to bid for the access to health? This is a real problem even here, where we take freedom from diseases like polio and tuberculosis for granted. More than half of all bankruptcies in the US are caused by medical bills. Many patients, upon learning they have cancer, have no choice. Die, or forfeit all you own.
Even among medical researchers, the debate rages.
This Novartis case is important because the courts chose the right to access to healthcare over the right to maintain control of intellectual property. They have said that when lives are at stake, profits are irrelevant.
Is this a good thing, or a bad thing?
If you are on the side of human life, it is an unequivocal good. On the side of free markets, it is a disaster.
Let’s hope this debate reaches our own shores with real-world consequences soon. It’s a debate that the millions of Americans in health-related bankruptcy would love to take part in.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- The Courts are on Our Side
- In South Dakota, Truth is Illegal
- The War on Women: Iowa Front
- The GOP’s Competition for Biggest Bully
- The Big Bad Michigan Abortion Bill is Back
March 29, 2013
|
|
Be The Change Friday: Easter and the Earth
|
This Sunday is Easter, and many families in America will be out with their children, hunting eggs and sharing baskets of treats.
This year, consider setting aside plastic grass, and instead using a renewable resource. You can shred old paper and recycle it afterwords, or you can use veggie straws for a healthier, edible grass.
Consider saving your plastic eggs for next year, rather than add them to our ever growing landfills.
Holidays are about family, and giving, and love. But that should not blind us to the dangers of wastefulness.
Additionally, you can put earth-friendly treats into Easter baskets. Flower growing kits, herb gardens, seeds… these all encourage a custodianship of the earth, as well as reminding us of the joy of spring.
This Easter, be kind to the earth as well as each other.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Be the Change Friday: End of Year Giving
- Women Helping Women- Fair Earth
- For Christmas, Don’t Give the Gift of Child Labor
- Be The Change Friday: Spring Cleaning
- One More Reason to Oppose Romney
March 28, 2013
|
|
The Supreme Court and DOMA
|
While things might not have looked particularly good OR bad at the Prop 8 hearings, there were definite changes in the overall tone by the time the DOMA hearing rolled along.
As expected, the four conservative justices (Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, and Alito) have made their position on marriage equality clear. Justice Scalia once famously compared gay people to murderers, and even supported throwing them in jail.
Also as expected, the four more reasonable judges (Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) are on the side of equal rights for all Americans. Sotomayor has made her position on anti-gay discrimination very clear over the day’s proceedings- she finds it appalling.
Which leaves only the swing voter- Justice Anthony Kennedy.
His votes have been sometimes confusing. While he tends to side more often with the conservative judges, he has been known to take unexpected swings center left. And most importantly, he has a history as an advocate for equal rights for LGBT Americans.
He made it clear yesterday that his greatest concern regarding DOMA was that it overrides the individual states’ ability to make their own laws in this regard, and he seems to find that unconstitutional.
Hopefully, come June or July, we’ll know how he really feels. And we will be one major step closer to recognizing the rights of every American.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- The Supreme Court and Prop 8
- Feminist of the Month- Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Limbaugh on Abortion: Kill the Women
- Obama on Gay Marriage
- The Courts are on Our Side
Next Page »



