|
|
H&M and the Only Acceptable Body
|
American women have a collective body image problem. Over a third of American women are obese. As many as 10 million women in America suffer from bulimia or anorexia. And the fashion industry has taken notice.
The Madrid City Council (which sponsors Fashion Week) has started mandating that models have a minimum BMI of 18. Kate Winslet famously attacked a magazine for doctoring photos of her to make her appear thinner. A tide is turning, encouraging women to have a healthy image on themselves, rather than an impossible one.
H&M, on the other hand, is taking the perception women have of their own bodies in the other direction. H&M has decided that, not only is one variety of body type acceptable for print, only one body PERIOD is attractive enough to model swimwear. The lone body is heavily edited, airbrushed, and photoshopped. The editors took real photographs (although presumably airbrushed as well) of models faces, and superimposed them onto the same body- and then matched the body’s skin tone to match the face.
Body after identical body tells the same story- no matter who you might be or what you might look like, you are only attractive enough if you look like this.
Shame on you, H&M.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (2)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- And End to Photoshopped Beauty Ads?
- What the GOP has Wrong
- Paul Ryan and the Pro-Rape Agenda
- Insanity from the GOP: Your Baby is an Organ
- While You Weren’t Looking at North Dakota
December 15, 2011
|
|
Racism: Alive and Well in America
|
Racist sentiments have been growing steadily in the United States. Much of it has been directed at Latinos, anti-Latino crime now accounts for two thirds of all hate crimes in the US. And much of that racism has been directed at Middle Eastern Americans, growing steadily since the September 11th attacks. But some of it just plain ol’ white versus black American bigotry. The sort of thing that it seems some Americans who still fly the Confederate Flag proudly seem to embrace.
Earlier this year, a poll taken of the Mississippi GOP showed that nearly half of the state’s Republicans wanted to ban interracial marriage. That’s heteronormative marriage between two people of different racial backgrounds. Interracial marriage has been legally protected in this country since 1967.
In Kentucky, the racist bigots are putting their money where their mouths are. An interracial couple, engaged to be married, performed a song together during worship for the white woman’s family church. A church that she had attended since she was a baby. Almost immediately thereafter, the church members voted to ban interracial couples from their congregation. To ban the girl who had grown up in their midst, and had inexplicably chosen to marry a black immigrant from Zimbabwe, from remaining in their church.
How dare she.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Hate in the Judiciary
- Why the GOP Doesn’t Want You to Vote
- You Can’t Rape a Wife- Just Ask the GOP
- Marriage Equality- Waiting for June
- Jailing Trans Americans in Arizona
December 14, 2011
|
|
“Fetal Homocide,” “Self Abortion,” and Imprisoning Women for Doing… What?
|
In New York City, a woman named Yaribely Almonte is being held for a first degree crime- “Self Abortion.” She says she drank an herbal tea before delivering her stillborn child prematurely- at 24wks gestational age. The fetus was found in the building’s dumpster.
She has another child, who presumably is in protective services while she herself is in jail. The evidence against her is entirely circumstantial, and irrelevant. What is more important is that after allegedly exercising her right for an abortion, she is being imprisoned. Only a few people have ever been arrested under this NYC statute.
This is an alarming and growing trend. In Idaho, Jennie McCormack was arrested for the same crime after purchasing abortifacients last year, although she was released due to a similar lack of evidence.
Even more sinister, a woman in Indiana named Bei Bei Shuai has been being held without bail for nine months for fetuscide. At 31 weeks pregnant, suffering from severe depression, Ms. Shuai attempted suicide by swallowing rat poison. At the hospital, her life was saved. However, while there she delivered her premature baby who died several days later.
This sets the precedent that any time a pregnant woman engages in potentially unsafe activity for her fetus, she could essentially be charged with murder. And worse, that any time a woman miscarries under “suspicious circumstances” that she could be charged likewise. It turn a need for compassion during the most painful moments of one’s life into a first degree crime.
Women who miscarry, and even those who do so intentionally, are not criminals. They are victims. The only crime committed here is by a set of laws that seek to turn a pregnant woman from a human being to an incubator- pure and simple.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Bei Bei Shuai, One Year Later
- The Double Standard for Pregnant Women’s Rights
- Limbaugh on Abortion: Kill the Women
- 2011 and the War on Women- Part Two
- Criminalizing Pregnancy
December 13, 2011
|
|
Marriage Equality in California
|
Last week, a federal judge ruled that California’s Prop 8- the notorious anti-gay-marriage initiative- was unconstitutional.
This is a huge victory for the California LGBT community, but it is also much more. It sends a message to other groups that would fight against equal rights that no one group has the right to deny happiness to another.
Prop 8 was largely funded and supported by Mormon groups. The groups, and religious or “values” based groups like them, have an amazing capacity for fundraising, and a frightening amount of clout when it comes to public policy. With a well organized campaign, they believed they could essentially undo the legislation their government enacted. And they were partially right- they were able to pass Prop 8.
But this federal ruling is another step firmly towards equality, and once that equality is legally supported, recognized, and enforced, these attempts to deny some subset of citizens their rights will begin to dwindle and die.
We cannot legislate an end to bigotry. We cannot litigate an end to ignorance and intolerance. What we can do is continue to fight for the rights of every person, regardless or race, religion, or sexual orientation, to share in the American dream of happiness and prosperity.
Congratulations, California! And welcome back to to the realm of reason and compassion.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- The Supreme Court and Prop 8
- Discriminating Against the HIV+ in Kansas
- Women of the 113th Congress: Julia Brownley
- Who’s Agenda Is It Anyway?
- The Supreme Court and DOMA
December 12, 2011
|
|
Honesty is Not the Best Policy for the GOP
|
A few weeks ago the Republican Governors Association met to go over strategy. One of the items on the agenda was figuring out how to talk about Occupy Wall Street. Frank Luntz, a Fox News commentator and pollster, said, “I’m frightened to death. They’re having an impact on what the American people think about capitalism.”
The GOP Governors put together a plan. They’ll use different words to say the same things. Instead of saying “capitalism,” they’ll say “economic freedom.” People like freedom, right?
Instead of saying, “tax the rich,” they’ll say “take from the rich.” That’s theft, nobody likes that.
Instead of, “middle class,” they’ll say “hardworking taxpayers.” It’s pretty obvious that the GOP has no ties to the middle class, better stay away from that term.
They won’t talk about “jobs,” they’ll talk about “careers.” People would rather have a career than a job, and since the GOP has done nothing to create jobs (they’ve been too focused on abortion and immigration), at least they can talk about careers with a straight face.
“Government spending” was redefined as “waste.” ”Entrepreneur” became “job creator.”
Some words were eliminated altogether. ”Sacrifice,” “bonus,” and “compromise” are words you won’t hear from the GOP.
And the new official position on any problem is… It’s Obama’s fault.
You might want to keep this list handy for the future. Soon we’ll need an entire codebook to decipher what they’re telling us.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- What the Ryan VP Pick Means
- When Obama Loses, We All Lose
- Tomorrow is Election Day
- GOP Extremism is the New Normal
- Ask the GOP- Women are Worth Less
December 9, 2011
|
|
A “Pardon” in Afghanistan
|
Last week, Afghan President Hamid Karzai pardoned a woman serving a twelve year prison sentence. Her crime? She had been raped by a relative.
Yes, in Afghanistan being raped is punishable by over a decade in jail. Unless you’re married to the rapist- then it’s not any sort of crime at all.
Things are even worse for her than that. At the time she was jailed, she was offered her freedom in exchange for marrying her rapist. She refused, and instead went to prison. And there she has remained for two years, giving birth to and raising a daughter conceived of the rape.
Not an unusual fate for women in Afghanistan, hundreds of whom languish in prisons for so-called “moral crimes,” which include being the victim of a rape and attempting to flee a husband.
So it would seem that this woman, known as Gulnaz, has finally reached the end of her nightmare.
Not so. President Karzai only pardoned her because she finally took up the original offer- she agreed to marry the man who raped her.
And such is the nature of justice for women in Afghanistan.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Routine Rape at Alabama Prison
- Mays and Richmond Go to Trial in Steubenville
- No Justice for Rape and Incest Victim
- “Rape is Rape” Bill in New York
- A Daughter is a Death Sentence in Afghanistan
December 8, 2011
|
|
Expanding the Death Penalty to Include Marijuana Possession
|
In October, a Gallup poll came out showing that half of the population of the United States is in favor of legalizing marijuana.
You would think that anyone trying to court the popular vote would keep that in mind. That they would consider cutting down the incredible costs of the war on drugs- an extraordinarily failed policy that has cost American taxpayers well over a trillion dollars.
Not Newt Gingrich. Newt Gingrich has an idea to make drug trafficking a capital offense. That’s right, he wants to give the death penalty to drug dealers.
And not just drug dealers. If just 30 grams of marijuana- barely over an ounce- were found on your person, in your home, in property that you owned regardless of whether or not you had been there recently, you could be tried for dealing drugs.
And you could get the death penalty.
If you think Newt is bluffing, don’t get your hopes up. He even went so far as to praise Singapore, who did in fact hang an Australian citizen who was arrested with .4 kilos of heroin in 2005.
Welcome to Newt’s America, where the biggest boom is in the state sanctioned killing of pot heads.
Vote smart, America. For all of our sakes.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Remembering Why Newt Gingrich is a Bad Idea
- When Race is a Death Sentence
- Can Santorum Take Down Romney?
- Gingrich Wins South Carolina- What it Means for the GOP
- Violence Against Women Week: Day Three- Overturning Rape Convictions in California
December 7, 2011
|
|
Victim Bashing Rhetoric from John Huntsman
|
The GOP field is appallingly anti-woman.
The candidates almost all want to repeal Roe v. Wade. Many support a personhood amendment that would make birth control illegal. They all want to repeal most of Obama’s health care laws, which provide a previously unprecedented amount of coverage for women to health care.
Their personal records aren’t much better. Gingrich is a known misogynist, running through wives and infidelities at a remarkable pace. And we all know where Herman Cain stands. Possibly assaulting, definitely harassing, and probably carrying on extramarital affairs with the women unfortunate enough to be the subjects of his power trips.
Now John Huntsman has finally made very clear where he stands on the issue of women. He recently described the women who came forward with their stories of sexual harassment at the hands of Herman Cain as, “bimbos.”
That’s right, he accused the victims of sexual misconduct (if not sexual violence) by a denigrating diminutive.
Perhaps if the mike had been off, he might have added that they probably dressed like sluts and were asking for it.
Huntsman has until now been the sole voice of moderation in most aspects of the GOP field. But when it comes to treating women like human beings deserving of respect, he’s clearly standing with the rest of the field. Looking down his nose at all us “bimbos” who have dared accuse a man of being inappropriate.
How dare we.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (2)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- He Said She Said, Bialek’s Fiance Said
- Shocker- Rush Limbaugh is an Outrageous Pig
- Ginger White and the Herman Cain Subtext
- A Women’s Health Epidemic?
- Herman Cain- Master Misogynist
December 6, 2011
|
|
Michele Bachmann and Forgetting Her Own Past
|
Last week, Michele Bachmann asserted that as president, she would close down the U.S. Embassy in Iran.
In 1980, the United States severed diplomatic ties with Iran, and has never reopened them.
Ms. Bachmann should know this. The events that led to the end of US/Iran diplomacy were extremely important in a year where Bachmann was closely involved with those very politics. You see, Michele Bachmann had just that year switched political camps. In 1976, she had worked for the Jimmy Carter campaign. But as his popularity waned, and as hostages were taken in Tehran and the entire nation waited and worried for their return, Bachmann made the switch to Reagan and the Republicans. Considering the implications that her choice to switch parties, to switch candidates, and to pursue a separate political ideology had for her life and career, it would seem that 1979 and 1980 should be fairly memorable to the Republican Congresswoman and candidate for the presidency.
However, Michele Bachmann had somehow forgotten the dramatic events that led to our current lack of diplomatic dialogue with Iran. Forgotten that very important chapter in her own life.
Her camp claims she was “speaking hypothetically,” which is to say her words were “not intended as a factual statement.” Perhaps. Whatever the cause, one must wonder if Michele Bachmann can possibly have enough control over her own mind, mouth, and memory to be responsible for the highest office in the land.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (1)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- Bachmann Backs Out
- Michele Bachmann- Michele Bachmann’s Last Fan
- Bachmann Beating a Dead Horse
- Like Rats From A Sinking Ship- The Bachmann Campain
- Sexism in the GOP
December 5, 2011
|
|
Herman Cain- How to Quit and Stay Ahead
|
As all good things, it seems that Herman Cain’s bid for the presidency has come to an end.
Cain announced over the weekend that he was suspending his campaign, because of, “the continued hurt caused on me and my family.”
Not because of the revelations of hurt that Cain had caused to women in his path over the years. That had nothing to do with it. But Cain has a plan to keep his family a little more safe and secure in the near future.
He isn’t giving up on his presidential bid. Technically.
That’s what’s important about the “suspension” of his campaign. He can legally go right on raising funds. He can continue to charge his campaign for his own book in order to keep profiting on both ends of his completely hopeless presidential bid.
In short? Herman Cain is, by “suspending” his campaign, bringing his situation very close to where it was before he miraculously became the GOP flavor of the week. Back to profiteering off the implosion of the Republican race to be anybody but Romney.
I suppose there must be some sort of moral to this story… but if the past is any indication there isn’t any sort of morality to be found in Herman Cain at all. Now we can just sit back and wait for Newt to take his turn to implode.
What do you think? Click here to leave a comment: Comments (0)
________________________________________
If you like this post please share or vote for it below:
Twitter: Tweet
Stumble:
delicious:
reddit:
Digg:
________________________________________
If you like this blog please subscribe to read updates in a
feed reader (it's free!)
(what is a feed reader? )
or by email!
Thanks! We really appreciate all your support!
________________________________________
Related Posts:
- More Reasons to Despise Herman Cain
- Fun Facts about Herman Cain
- Ginger White and the Herman Cain Subtext
- Herman Cain- Master Misogynist
- Bachmann Beating a Dead Horse
« Previous Page — Next Page »




